FX-9370 vs Ryzen 5 3500X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3500X
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
8.52
+114%

Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms FX-9370 by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8391360
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation32.731.23
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date24 September 2019 (4 years ago)6 July 2013 (10 years ago)
Current price$125 $162

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 3500X has 2561% better value for money than FX-9370.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads68
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)8192 KB
L3 cache32 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data57 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9370 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9370.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3500X 8.52
+114%
FX-9370 3.99

Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms FX-9370 by 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 3500X 13176
+114%
FX-9370 6167

Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms FX-9370 by 114% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 3500X 1558
+204%
FX-9370 512

Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms FX-9370 by 204% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 3500X 5871
+187%
FX-9370 2047

Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms FX-9370 by 187% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.52 3.99
Recency 24 September 2019 6 July 2013
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 6 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 220 Watt

The Ryzen 5 3500X is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9370 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3500X and FX-9370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
Ryzen 5 3500X
AMD FX-9370
FX-9370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1715 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 152 votes

Rate FX-9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3500X or FX-9370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.