Ryzen 5 3500X vs FX-6300

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX-6300
2012
6 cores / 6 threads
2.67

Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms FX-6300 by a whopping 219% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Ryzen 5 3500X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1603821
Place by popularity61not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.3228.28
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)24 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$67 $153

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 3500X has 2042% better value for money than FX-6300.

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Ryzen 5 3500X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads66
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache288 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Ryzen 5 3500X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Ryzen 5 3500X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Ryzen 5 3500X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Ryzen 5 3500X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Ryzen 5 3500X.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6300 2.67
Ryzen 5 3500X 8.52
+219%

Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms FX-6300 by 219% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6300 4137
Ryzen 5 3500X 13176
+218%

Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms FX-6300 by 218% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-6300 462
Ryzen 5 3500X 1559
+237%

Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms FX-6300 by 237% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-6300 1451
Ryzen 5 3500X 5878
+305%

Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms FX-6300 by 305% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.67 8.52
Recency 23 October 2012 24 September 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 5 3500X is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Ryzen 5 3500X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
Ryzen 5 3500X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3748 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1675 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or Ryzen 5 3500X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.