Core 2 Extreme QX9300 vs Ryzen 5 3450U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3450U
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 2 Watt
3.71
+264%
Core 2 Extreme QX9300
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.02

Ryzen 5 3450U outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX9300 by a whopping 264% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16352669
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Core 2 Extreme
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenamePicasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 May 2020 (5 years ago)August 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3450U and Core 2 Extreme QX9300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.53 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.53 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cache384 KB64 KB
L2 cache2 MB12 MB
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography12 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data2x 107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors4500 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3450U and Core 2 Extreme QX9300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFP5PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)2 MB + 4 MB45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Core 2 Extreme QX9300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
AMTno data+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 3450U and Core 2 Extreme QX9300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Core 2 Extreme QX9300 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Core 2 Extreme QX9300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 3450U 3.71
+264%
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 1.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3450U 6550
+263%
Samples: 317
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 1805

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.71 1.02
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 12 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 5 3450U has a 263.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 2150% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 5 3450U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3450U
Ryzen 5 3450U
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Core 2 Extreme QX9300

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 409 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3450U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 108 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 3450U and Core 2 Extreme QX9300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.