Celeron N3160 vs Ryzen 5 3450U
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 3450U outperforms Celeron N3160 by a whopping 472% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 3450U and Celeron N3160 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1329 | 2601 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) | Braswell (2015−2016) |
| Release date | 1 May 2020 (4 years ago) | 15 January 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 3450U and Celeron N3160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | IDI |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4500 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 3450U and Celeron N3160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FP5 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 4 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Celeron N3160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Celeron N3160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Celeron N3160.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.35 | 0.76 |
| Integrated graphics card | 4.50 | 0.62 |
| Recency | 1 May 2020 | 15 January 2016 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 4 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3450U has a 472.4% higher aggregate performance score, 625.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron N3160, on the other hand, has 275% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 5 3450U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3160 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3450U and Celeron N3160, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
