EPYC 72F3 vs Ryzen 5 2600E

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2600E
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
7.34
EPYC 72F3
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
16.99
+131%

EPYC 72F3 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600E by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1036400
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.46
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.809.03
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesTSMC
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date10 September 2018 (6 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,468

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600E and EPYC 72F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3137
L1 cache576 KB512 KB
L2 cache3 MB4 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm+
Die size213 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600E and EPYC 72F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and EPYC 72F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and EPYC 72F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and EPYC 72F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and EPYC 72F3.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 2600E 7.34
EPYC 72F3 16.99
+131%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2600E 11771
EPYC 72F3 27252
+132%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.34 16.99
Recency 10 September 2018 12 January 2021
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 180 Watt

Ryzen 5 2600E has 300% lower power consumption.

EPYC 72F3, on the other hand, has a 131.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 72F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 2600E in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 2600E is a desktop processor while EPYC 72F3 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2600E
Ryzen 5 2600E
AMD EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 17 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 72F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 2600E and EPYC 72F3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.