i9-10940XE vs Ryzen 5 2600E
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 2600E and Core i9-10940XE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Cascade Lake-X (2019) |
| Release date | 19 September 2018 (6 years ago) | 19 October 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 2600E and Core i9-10940XE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 28 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 31 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 19.25 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 2600E and Core i9-10940XE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | 2066 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and Core i9-10940XE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 2600E and Core i9-10940XE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and Core i9-10940XE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and Core i9-10940XE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 Quad-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and Core i9-10940XE.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 September 2018 | 19 October 2019 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 14 |
| Threads | 12 | 28 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 165 Watt |
Ryzen 5 2600E has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 153.8% lower power consumption.
i9-10940XE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 2600E and Core i9-10940XE. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600E and Core i9-10940XE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
