Xeon X3460 vs Ryzen 5 2600

Primary Details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon X3460 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	815	1855
Place by popularity	27	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	20.04	0.70
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Series	AMD Ryzen 5	no data
Architecture codename	Pinnacle Riege (Zen+)	no data
Release date	19 April 2018 (6 years ago)	1 July 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data
Current price	$147 (0.7x MSRP)	$67

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 2600 has 2763% better value for money than Xeon X3460.

Detailed Specifications

Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon X3460 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	12	8
Base clock speed	3.4 GHz	2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.9 GHz	3.46 GHz
L1 cache	96K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	3 MB	no data
L3 cache	16 MB (shared)	8 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography	12 nm	45 nm
Die size	192 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	95 °C	73 °C
Number of transistors	4,800 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon X3460 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	AM4	FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon X3460. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	DDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME	Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	-
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	+
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	no data	-
Demand Based Switching	no data	+
PAE	no data	36 Bit
Status	no data	Discontinued

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon X3460 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon X3460 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon X3460. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4	DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size	128 GB	32 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	46.933 GB/s	21 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon X3460.

PCIe version	3.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	20	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Xeon X3460 by 347% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Performance score	8.53	1.91
Recency	19 April 2018	1 July 2009
Physical cores	6	4
Threads	12	8
Chip lithography	12 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon X3460, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---