Atom x7-Z8750 vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by a whopping 911% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1140 | 2890 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.36 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | 7x Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 8.33 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Cherry Trail (2015−2016) |
| Release date | 11 April 2017 (8 years ago) | 1 April 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | $37 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 1600X and Atom x7-Z8750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.56 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 36 | 16 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and Atom x7-Z8750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | UTFCBGA1380 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 2 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Atom x7-Z8750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 1600X and Atom x7-Z8750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Atom x7-Z8750 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Atom x7-Z8750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) (400 - 600 MHz) |
| Max video memory | - | 8 GB |
| Graphics max frequency | - | 600 MHz |
| Execution Units | - | 16 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 1600X and Atom x7-Z8750 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | - | 3 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Atom x7-Z8750 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | - | 3840x2160 |
| Max resolution over eDP | - | 2560x1600 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Atom x7-Z8750.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 2 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 3 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.38 | 0.73 |
| Recency | 11 April 2017 | 1 April 2016 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 2 Watt |
Ryzen 5 1600X has a 911% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Atom x7-Z8750, on the other hand, has 4650% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x7-Z8750 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 5 1600X is a desktop processor while Atom x7-Z8750 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
