A10-7850K vs Ryzen 5 1500X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 5 1500X
2017
4 cores / 8 threads
5.88
+166%

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 166% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Ryzen 5 1500X and A10-7850K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking10261724
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money10.080.55
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD A-Series (Desktop)
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Godaveri (2014−2018)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)14 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189$173
Current price$111 (0.6x MSRP)$92 (0.5x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 1500X has 1733% better value for money than A10-7850K.

Technical specs

Ryzen 5 1500X and A10-7850K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size192 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data72 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1500X and A10-7850K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1500X and A10-7850K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTSSE1-4A, AVX, FM4A, VT
AES-NI+1
FMAno dataFMA4
AVX++
FRTCno data1
FreeSyncno data1
PowerTuneno data-
DualGraphicsno data1
TrueAudiono data+
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data+
VirusProtectno data+
HSAno data1

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1500X and A10-7850K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1500X and A10-7850K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-2133
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core count-8
Number of pipelines-512
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-1
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 1500X and A10-7850K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 1500X and A10-7850K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-DirectX® 12
Vulkan-1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1500X and A10-7850K.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1500X 5.88
+166%
A10-7850K 2.21

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 166% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 1500X 9094
+166%
A10-7850K 3416

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 166% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 1500X 1105
+146%
A10-7850K 450

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 146% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 1500X 3642
+220%
A10-7850K 1138

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 220% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 1500X 4573
+42.2%
A10-7850K 3216

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 42% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 1500X 20186
+96.4%
A10-7850K 10278

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 96% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 1500X 7403
+55.9%
A10-7850K 4748

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 56% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 5 1500X 6.9
+89.9%
A10-7850K 13.1

A10-7850K outperforms Ryzen 5 1500X by 90% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 1500X 9
+149%
A10-7850K 4

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 149% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 1500X 805
+153%
A10-7850K 318

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 153% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 1500X 154
+79.1%
A10-7850K 86

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 79% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 1500X 1.73
+71.3%
A10-7850K 1.01

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 71% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 1500X 4.9
+123%
A10-7850K 2.2

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 123% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 1500X 3910
+82.7%
A10-7850K 2140

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 83% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 1500X 177
+55.3%
A10-7850K 114

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 55% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 1500X 50
+105%
A10-7850K 24

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 105% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Ryzen 5 1500X 13198
+103%
A10-7850K 6502

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 103% in Geekbench 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Ryzen 5 1500X 14463
+131%
A10-7850K 6267

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 131% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Ryzen 5 1500X 4149
+58.3%
A10-7850K 2621

Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms A10-7850K by 58% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 5.88 2.21
Recency 11 April 2017 14 January 2014
Threads 8 4
Cost $189 $173
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

The Ryzen 5 1500X is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7850K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1500X and A10-7850K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
Ryzen 5 1500X
AMD A10-7850K
A10-7850K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 851 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 1500X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 266 votes

Rate A10-7850K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1500X or A10-7850K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.