Pro A12-8800B vs Ryzen 5 1400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1400
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.01
+200%

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by a whopping 200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1400 and Pro A12-8800B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11521979
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.26no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Carrizo
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169no data
Current price$80 (0.5x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1400 and Pro A12-8800B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1400 and Pro A12-8800B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4FP4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt12-35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and Pro A12-8800B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTHSA 1.0
AES-NI+1
FMAno dataFMA4
AVX+AVX
FreeSyncno data1
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data+
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data+
VirusProtectno data+
RAIDno data+
HSAno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and Pro A12-8800B are enumerated here.

AMD-V+1
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and Pro A12-8800B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3/DDR3L-2133
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core count-8
Number of pipelines-512
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-1
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 1400 and Pro A12-8800B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and Pro A12-8800B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-DirectX® 12
Vulkan-no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and Pro A12-8800B.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1400 5.01
+200%
Pro A12-8800B 1.67

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 1400 7751
+200%
Pro A12-8800B 2580

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 200% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 1400 953
+82.2%
Pro A12-8800B 523

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 82% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 1400 3119
+172%
Pro A12-8800B 1146

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 172% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 1400 4205
+88%
Pro A12-8800B 2236

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 88% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 1400 17557
+182%
Pro A12-8800B 6220

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 182% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 1400 6437
+132%
Pro A12-8800B 2769

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 132% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 5 1400 7.8
+111%
Pro A12-8800B 16.49

Pro A12-8800B outperforms Ryzen 5 1400 by 111% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 1400 8
+209%
Pro A12-8800B 3

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 209% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 1400 688
+234%
Pro A12-8800B 206

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 234% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 1400 134
+85.8%
Pro A12-8800B 72

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 86% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 1400 1.53
+68.1%
Pro A12-8800B 0.91

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 68% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 1400 4.1
+165%
Pro A12-8800B 1.6

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 165% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 1400 2758
+106%
Pro A12-8800B 1336

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 106% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 1400 43
+171%
Pro A12-8800B 16

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 171% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 1400 147
+93.7%
Pro A12-8800B 76

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 94% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.01 1.67
Recency 11 April 2017 3 June 2015
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 12 Watt

The Ryzen 5 1400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pro A12-8800B in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1400 is a desktop processor while Pro A12-8800B is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1400 and Pro A12-8800B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Ryzen 5 1400
AMD Pro A12-8800B
Pro A12-8800B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 701 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Pro A12-8800B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1400 or Pro A12-8800B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.