Pentium Dual T3200 vs Ryzen 5 1400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1400
2017, $169
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
4.38
+1053%
Pentium Dual Core T3200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 1 Watt
0.38

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Pentium Dual Core T3200 by a whopping 1053% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14813269
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.73no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Pentium Dual Core
Power efficiency7.22no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date16 March 2017 (8 years ago)1 October 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1400 and Pentium Dual Core T3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s667 MHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size213 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4800 Million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1400 and Pentium Dual Core T3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt1 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and Pentium Dual Core T3200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and Pentium Dual Core T3200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and Pentium Dual Core T3200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and Pentium Dual Core T3200.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 1400 4.38
+1053%
Pentium Dual T3200 0.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1400 7731
+1056%
Samples: 1433
Pentium Dual T3200 669
Samples: 361

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 5 1400 17557
+388%
Pentium Dual T3200 3600

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.38 0.38
Recency 16 March 2017 1 October 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 1 Watt

Ryzen 5 1400 has a 1052.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium Dual T3200, on the other hand, has 6400% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1400 is a desktop processor while Pentium Dual Core T3200 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Ryzen 5 1400
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200
Pentium Dual Core T3200

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 835 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 94 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 1400 and Pentium Dual Core T3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.