FX-6200 vs Ryzen 5 1400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1400
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.01
+89.1%

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms FX-6200 by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1400 and FX-6200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11521636
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.260.63
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)27 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169no data
Current price$80 (0.5x MSRP)$38

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 1400 has 2163% better value for money than FX-6200.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1400 and FX-6200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads86
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)288 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)6144 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8192 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size192 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1400 and FX-6200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and FX-6200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and FX-6200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and FX-6200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and FX-6200.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1400 5.01
+89.1%
FX-6200 2.65

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms FX-6200 by 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 1400 7751
+88.8%
FX-6200 4105

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms FX-6200 by 89% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 1400 954
+132%
FX-6200 412

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms FX-6200 by 132% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 1400 3118
+139%
FX-6200 1304

Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms FX-6200 by 139% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.01 2.65
Recency 11 April 2017 27 February 2012
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 6
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

The Ryzen 5 1400 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1400 and FX-6200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Ryzen 5 1400
AMD FX-6200
FX-6200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 701 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 126 votes

Rate FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1400 or FX-6200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.