Ryzen 3 3250U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
2019
4 cores / 4 threads
3.85
+54.6%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by 55% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13641646
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2020)Picasso (2019−2020)
Release date8 April 2019 (5 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$718 $430

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm12 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors4500 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1212

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 3.85
+54.6%
Ryzen 3 3250U 2.49

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by 55% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 5955
+54.6%
Ryzen 3 3250U 3852

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by 55% in Passmark.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 6
+39.7%
Ryzen 3 3250U 4

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by 40% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 481
+36.3%
Ryzen 3 3250U 353

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by 36% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 126
+3.6%
Ryzen 3 3250U 122

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by 4% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 1.43
Ryzen 3 3250U 1.46
+2.1%

Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U by 2% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.85 2.49
Integrated graphics card 3.03 2.97
Recency 8 April 2019 6 January 2020
Physical cores 4 2

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3250U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 24 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1909 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U or Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.