E2-3800 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.39
+501%
E2-3800
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.73

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms E2-3800 by a whopping 501% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and E2-3800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13392677
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD A-Series
Power efficiency6.394.61
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and E2-3800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache384 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB2048 KB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography12 nm28 nm
Die size209.78 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and E2-3800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4FT3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and E2-3800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and E2-3800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and E2-3800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Vega 8AMD Radeon HD 8280
Number of pipelinesno data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and E2-3800 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and E2-3800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and E2-3800.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes204

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 4.39
+501%
E2-3800 0.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 6980
+506%
E2-3800 1152

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.39 0.73
Integrated graphics card 4.50 0.67
Recency 30 September 2019 23 May 2013
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a 501.4% higher aggregate performance score, 571.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

E2-3800, on the other hand, has 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3800 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is a desktop processor while E2-3800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and E2-3800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
AMD E2-3800
E2-3800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 140 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 104 votes

Rate E2-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G or E2-3800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.