Athlon 64 FX-55 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms Athlon 64 FX-55 by a whopping 1504% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1634 | 3430 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.41 | 0.09 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Clawhammer (2001−2005) |
| Release date | 30 September 2019 (6 years ago) | 10 October 2004 (21 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $180 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Athlon 64 FX-55 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 63 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4940 Million | 105 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Athlon 64 FX-55 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Socket AM4 | 939 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 104 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Athlon 64 FX-55. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Athlon 64 FX-55 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Athlon 64 FX-55. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR1 Depends on motherboard |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 8 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Athlon 64 FX-55.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.69 | 0.23 |
| Recency | 30 September 2019 | 10 October 2004 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 104 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a 1504.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
