Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Ryzen 3 3300X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3300X
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.77
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
18.49
+111%

Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3300X by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking890342
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.9728.20
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency12.3016.06
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
Release date24 April 2020 (4 years ago)20 April 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$120$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 3300X has 10% better value for money than Ryzen 7 5800X3D.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size74 mm274 + 125 mm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °C90 °C
Number of transistors3,800 million8,850 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 286x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3300X 8.77
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 18.49
+111%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3300X 13425
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 28302
+111%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 3300X 1711
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 2119
+23.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 3300X 5940
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 11083
+86.6%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 3 3300X 5856
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 6008
+2.6%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 3 3300X 25416
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 42010
+65.3%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 3 3300X 6.04
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 3.65
+65.5%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 3 3300X 12
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 27
+130%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 3 3300X 1071
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 2413
+125%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 3 3300X 195
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 241
+23.6%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 3 3300X 2.28
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 2.77
+21.5%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 3 3300X 5.9
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 13.8
+134%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 3 3300X 62
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 138
+124%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 3 3300X 234
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 292
+25.1%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 3 3300X 7177
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 14431
+101%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 3 3300X 5311
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 10856
+104%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 3 3300X 449
+111%
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 213

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 3 3300X 1296
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 1622
+25.2%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 3 3300X 5329
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 6799
+27.6%

7-Zip

Ryzen 3 3300X 30353
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 69518
+129%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.77 18.49
Recency 24 April 2020 20 April 2022
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 105 Watt

Ryzen 3 3300X has 61.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 5800X3D, on the other hand, has a 110.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3300X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
Ryzen 3 3300X
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1056 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2150 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3300X or Ryzen 7 5800X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.