Celeron N6211 vs Ryzen 3 3200G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.66
+217%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 217% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13092193
Place by popularity28not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.903.33
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Elkhart Lake
Power efficiency6.5420.62
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date12 June 2019 (5 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 3200G has 167% better value for money than Celeron N6211.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography12 nm10 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3200G 4.66
+217%
Celeron N6211 1.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3200G 7129
+218%
Celeron N6211 2245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.66 1.47
Integrated graphics card 4.50 1.39
Recency 12 June 2019 17 July 2022
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen 3 3200G has a 217% higher aggregate performance score, 223.7% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3086 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3200G or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.