A4-4020 vs Ryzen 3 3200G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.48
+460%
A4-4020
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.80

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms A4-4020 by a whopping 460% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3200G and A4-4020 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13272620
Place by popularity42not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.90no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency6.531.17
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3200G and A4-4020 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache96 KB (per core)96K
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography12 nm32 nm
Die size210 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors4,940 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3200G and A4-4020 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and A4-4020. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and A4-4020 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and A4-4020. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3-1333
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Vega 8AMD Radeon HD 7480D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and A4-4020.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3200G 4.48
+460%
A4-4020 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3200G 7124
+462%
A4-4020 1268

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 3200G 1076
+220%
A4-4020 336

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 3200G 3063
+599%
A4-4020 438

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.48 0.80
Integrated graphics card 4.51 0.72
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 12 nm 32 nm

Ryzen 3 3200G has a 460% higher aggregate performance score, 526.4% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-4020 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3200G and A4-4020, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G
AMD A4-4020
A4-4020

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3192 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 33 votes

Rate A4-4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3200G or A4-4020, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.