Atom Z2560 vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Atom Z2560 by a whopping 1714% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1620 | 3471 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.79 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 6.30 | 7.52 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) | Clovertrail (2013) |
| Release date | 8 January 2018 (7 years ago) | 27 February 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom Z2560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 35 | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 65 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4950 Million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom Z2560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FC-MB4760 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom Z2560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| Smart Idle | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom Z2560 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom Z2560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 8.5 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz) | PowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz) |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom Z2560 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom Z2560.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
| USB revision | no data | 2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 2 |
| UART | no data | 3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.81 | 0.21 |
| Recency | 8 January 2018 | 27 February 2013 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 3 Watt |
Ryzen 3 2200G has a 1714.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z2560, on the other hand, has 2066.7% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z2560 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 3 2200G is a desktop processor while Atom Z2560 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
