Ryzen 3 3300U vs Ryzen 3 1300X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 1300X
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.47
+22.8%
Ryzen 3 3300U
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.64

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms Ryzen 3 3300U by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 3300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13391510
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.99no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency6.3922.54
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 3300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3421
L1 cache96K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size192 mm2209.78 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 3300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 3300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 3300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 3300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 3300U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 1300X 4.47
+22.8%
Ryzen 3 3300U 3.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 1300X 6973
+22.8%
Ryzen 3 3300U 5679

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 3 1300X 4676
+9.3%
Ryzen 3 3300U 4280

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 3 1300X 16094
+30.2%
Ryzen 3 3300U 12357

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 3 1300X 6310
+45.7%
Ryzen 3 3300U 4332

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 3 1300X 10.8
+10.6%
Ryzen 3 3300U 11.94

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 3 1300X 558
+18.5%
Ryzen 3 3300U 471

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 3 1300X 152
+13.4%
Ryzen 3 3300U 134

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 3 1300X 3
+11.1%
Ryzen 3 3300U 2.7

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 3 1300X 38
+46.6%
Ryzen 3 3300U 26

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 3 1300X 182
+37.5%
Ryzen 3 3300U 132

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 3 1300X 2677
+11.6%
Ryzen 3 3300U 2398

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 3 1300X 5210
+102%
Ryzen 3 3300U 2578

Blender(-)

Ryzen 3 1300X 870
Ryzen 3 3300U 1212
+39.3%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 3 1300X 920
+11.7%
Ryzen 3 3300U 824

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 3 1300X 3772
+12.9%
Ryzen 3 3300U 3340

7-Zip

Ryzen 3 1300X 13712
+13.2%
Ryzen 3 3300U 12118

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 3 1300X 171
+11.4%
Ryzen 3 3300U 154

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Ryzen 3 1300X 11803
+15.5%
Ryzen 3 3300U 10223

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Ryzen 3 1300X 4250
+15.7%
Ryzen 3 3300U 3672

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.47 3.64
Recency 27 July 2017 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 1300X has a 22.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen 3 3300U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 1300X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3300U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 1300X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 3300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 3300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
Ryzen 3 1300X
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U
Ryzen 3 3300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 273 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 1300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 216 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 1300X or Ryzen 3 3300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.