EPYC 8024P vs Processor U300
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 8024P outperforms Processor U300 by a whopping 133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1431 | 796 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 17.44 | 22.62 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Raptor Lake-U | no data |
| Power efficiency | 14.06 | 5.47 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (3 years ago) | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $193 | $409 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 8024P has 30% better value for money than Processor U300.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Processor U300 and EPYC 8024P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 5 (Penta-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 55 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 73 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 75 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 8,875 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Processor U300 and EPYC 8024P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 90 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor U300 and EPYC 8024P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Processor U300 and EPYC 8024P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor U300 and EPYC 8024P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor U300 and EPYC 8024P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor U300 and EPYC 8024P.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.00 | 11.67 |
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 18 September 2023 |
| Physical cores | 5 | 8 |
| Threads | 6 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 90 Watt |
Processor U300 has 500% lower power consumption.
EPYC 8024P, on the other hand, has a 133% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, 60% more physical cores and 167% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 8024P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor U300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Processor U300 is a notebook processor while EPYC 8024P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
