Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Processor N200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core threads, 6 Watt
1.57
Ryzen 7 8845HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
18.66
+1089%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 1089% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Processor N200 and Ryzen 7 8845HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2025292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-Nno data
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-NHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Processor N200 and Ryzen 7 8845HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads44 x 3.7  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core16
Base clock speed0.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Processor N200 and Ryzen 7 8845HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1264FP8
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and Ryzen 7 8845HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Processor N200 and Ryzen 7 8845HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and Ryzen 7 8845HS are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and Ryzen 7 8845HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR54800 MHz Single-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and Ryzen 7 8845HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes920

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Processor N200 1.57
Ryzen 7 8845HS 18.66
+1089%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Processor N200 by 1089% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Processor N200 3937
Ryzen 7 8845HS 7523
+91.1%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Processor N200 by 91% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Processor N200 7549
Ryzen 7 8845HS 47332
+527%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Processor N200 by 527% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Processor N200 25.99
Ryzen 7 8845HS 5.3
+390%

Processor N200 outperforms Ryzen 7 8845HS by 390% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Processor N200 3
Ryzen 7 8845HS 29
+973%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Processor N200 by 973% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Processor N200 219
Ryzen 7 8845HS 2555
+1067%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Processor N200 by 1067% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Processor N200 113
Ryzen 7 8845HS 274
+142%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Processor N200 by 142% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Processor N200 1.36
Ryzen 7 8845HS 3.29
+142%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Processor N200 by 142% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Processor N200 3.2
Ryzen 7 8845HS 14
+338%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Processor N200 by 338% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Processor N200 2115
Ryzen 7 8845HS 19008
+799%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Processor N200 by 799% in WinRAR 4.0.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.57 18.66
Integrated graphics card 3.04 18.35
Recency 3 January 2023 6 December 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 45 Watt

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N200 and Ryzen 7 8845HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N200
Processor N200
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
Ryzen 7 8845HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 111 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 237 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8845HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor N200 or Ryzen 7 8845HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.