Ultra 9 285 vs Processor N200

VS

Primary details

Comparing Processor N200 and Core Ultra 9 285 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2122not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-Nno data
Power efficiency24.59no data
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$193no data

Detailed specifications

Processor N200 and Core Ultra 9 285 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed0.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.6 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Processor N200 and Core Ultra 9 285 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 12641851
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and Core Ultra 9 285. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Security technologies

Processor N200 and Core Ultra 9 285 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and Core Ultra 9 285 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and Core Ultra 9 285. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channelDDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and Core Ultra 9 285.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes920

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 125 Watt

Processor N200 has 1983.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Processor N200 and Core Ultra 9 285. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Processor N200 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N200 and Core Ultra 9 285, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N200
Processor N200
Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Core Ultra 9 285

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 148 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 74 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor N200 or Core Ultra 9 285, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.