Atom 330 vs Pro A6-8500B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Pro A6-8500B
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.91
+314%

Pro A6-8500B outperforms Atom 330 by a whopping 314% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27903485
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoIntel Atom
Power efficiency2.561.16
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Diamondville (2008−2009)
Release date3 June 2015 (10 years ago)2 April 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$43

Detailed specifications

Pro A6-8500B and Atom 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cacheno data112 KB
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data51.9276 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million94 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Pro A6-8500B and Atom 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP4PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A6-8500B and Atom 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Pro A6-8500B and Atom 330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A6-8500B and Atom 330 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A6-8500B and Atom 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-1600no data
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphics-
iGPU core count4-
จำนวนพาธไลน์256-
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pro A6-8500B and Atom 330 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pro A6-8500B and Atom 330 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12-
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A6-8500B and Atom 330.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pro A6-8500B 0.91
+314%
Atom 330 0.22

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Pro A6-8500B 1592
+318%
Samples: 6
Atom 330 381
Samples: 194

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.91 0.22
Recency 3 June 2015 2 April 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 8 Watt

Pro A6-8500B has a 313.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Atom 330, on the other hand, has 87.5% lower power consumption.

The AMD Pro A6-8500B is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom 330 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Pro A6-8500B
Pro A6-8500B
Intel Atom 330
Atom 330

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate Pro A6-8500B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 68 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pro A6-8500B and Atom 330, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.