Core i7-3687U vs Pro A12-8800B

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Pro A12-8800B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads
1.64
Core i7-3687U
2013
2 cores / 4 threads
1.68
+2.4%

Core i7-3687U outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Pro A12-8800B and Core i7-3687U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19481926
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoIntel Core i7
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date3 June 2015 (8 years ago)8 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Current priceno data$476

Detailed Specifications

Pro A12-8800B and Core i7-3687U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data118 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pro A12-8800B and Core i7-3687U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A12-8800B and Core i7-3687U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0Intel® AVX
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4no data
AVXAVX+
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID+no data
HSA+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Pro A12-8800B and Core i7-3687U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A12-8800B and Core i7-3687U are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A12-8800B and Core i7-3687U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-2133DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 4000
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
Graphics max frequencyno data1.2 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pro A12-8800B and Core i7-3687U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pro A12-8800B and Core i7-3687U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A12-8800B and Core i7-3687U.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro A12-8800B 1.64
i7-3687U 1.68
+2.4%

Core i7-3687U outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pro A12-8800B 2580
i7-3687U 2646
+2.6%

Core i7-3687U outperforms Pro A12-8800B by 3% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pro A12-8800B 522
+2.6%
i7-3687U 509

Pro A12-8800B outperforms Core i7-3687U by 3% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pro A12-8800B 1143
+13.8%
i7-3687U 1004

Pro A12-8800B outperforms Core i7-3687U by 14% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.64 1.68
Integrated graphics card 1.17
Recency 3 June 2015 8 January 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 17 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pro A12-8800B and Core i7-3687U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A12-8800B and Core i7-3687U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Pro A12-8800B
Pro A12-8800B
Intel Core i7-3687U
Core i7-3687U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate Pro A12-8800B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 36 votes

Rate Core i7-3687U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Pro A12-8800B or Core i7-3687U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.