EPYC 9115 vs Phenom X4 9150e

Primary details

Comparing Phenom X4 9150e and EPYC 9115 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2555not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.29no data
Architecture codenameAgena (2007−2008)Turin (2024)
Release dateJuly 2008 (16 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$726

Detailed specifications

Phenom X4 9150e and EPYC 9115 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die size285 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors450 million16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X4 9150e and EPYC 9115 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM2+SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X4 9150e and EPYC 9115. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9150e and EPYC 9115 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X4 9150e and EPYC 9115. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom X4 9150e and EPYC 9115.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

Phenom X4 9150e has 92.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9115, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Phenom X4 9150e and EPYC 9115. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Phenom X4 9150e is a desktop processor while EPYC 9115 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X4 9150e and EPYC 9115, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom X4 9150e
Phenom X4 9150e
AMD EPYC 9115
EPYC 9115

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 24 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9150e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9115 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom X4 9150e or EPYC 9115, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.