A6-7000 vs Phenom X3 8450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom X3 8450
2008
3 cores / 3 threads, 95 Watt
0.69
+21.1%

Phenom X3 8450 outperforms A6-7000 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29313065
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Kaveri
Power efficiency0.78no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameToliman (2008)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release dateApril 2008 (17 years ago)1 June 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom X3 8450 and A6-7000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads32
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die size285 mm2no data
Number of transistors450 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X3 8450 and A6-7000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM2+FT3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt1 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X3 8450 and A6-7000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X3 8450 and A6-7000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X3 8450 and A6-7000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom X3 8450 and A6-7000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Phenom X3 8450 and A6-7000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom X3 8450 and A6-7000.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Phenom X3 8450 0.69
+21.1%
A6-7000 0.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Phenom X3 8450 1221
+21.9%
Samples: 257
A6-7000 1002
Samples: 28

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 0.57
Physical cores 3 2
Threads 3 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 1 Watt

Phenom X3 8450 has a 21.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

A6-7000, on the other hand, has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 9400% lower power consumption.

The AMD Phenom X3 8450 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-7000 in performance tests.

Note that Phenom X3 8450 is a desktop processor while A6-7000 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom X3 8450
Phenom X3 8450
AMD A6-7000
A6-7000

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 125 votes

Rate Phenom X3 8450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 14 votes

Rate A6-7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Phenom X3 8450 and A6-7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.