Sempron 3300+ vs Phenom II X6 1045T
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X6 1045T outperforms Sempron 3300+ by a whopping 917% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2165 | 3507 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.29 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 0.82 | 0.12 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Thuban (2010) | Palermo (2001−2005) |
| Release date | 1 September 2010 (15 years ago) | January 2001 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $175 | $30 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X6 1045T and Sempron 3300+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 346 mm2 | 101 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 904 million | 69 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X6 1045T and Sempron 3300+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 62 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1045T and Sempron 3300+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1045T and Sempron 3300+.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.83 | 0.18 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 6 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 62 Watt |
Phenom II X6 1045T has a 916.7% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.
Sempron 3300+, on the other hand, has 53.2% lower power consumption.
The AMD Phenom II X6 1045T is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Sempron 3300+ in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
