Turion 64 X2 TL-50 vs Phenom II X4 P960

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 P960
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.88
+184%
Turion 64 X2 TL-50
2006, $154
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.31

Phenom II X4 P960 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-50 by a whopping 184% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28093389
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series4x AMD Phenom II2x AMD Turion 64
Power efficiency1.490.42
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Taylor (2006)
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)17 May 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$154

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 P960 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data147 mm2
Number of transistorsno data154 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 P960 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1 (S1g4)S1
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0SSE(1,2,3), AMD64
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Phenom II X4 P960 0.88
+184%
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 0.31

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom II X4 P960 232
+149%
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 93

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom II X4 P960 796
+453%
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 144

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Phenom II X4 P960 2519
+113%
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 1184

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.88 0.31
Recency 19 October 2010 17 May 2006
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 31 Watt

Phenom II X4 P960 has a 183.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 24% lower power consumption.

The AMD Phenom II X4 P960 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 P960
Phenom II X4 P960
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Turion 64 X2 TL-50

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 174 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 P960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 26 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Phenom II X4 P960 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.