PRO A8-9600 vs Phenom II X4 P960
Aggregate performance score
PRO A8-9600 outperforms Phenom II X4 P960 by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 P960 and PRO A8-9600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2476 | 1872 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | 4x AMD Phenom II | no data |
Power efficiency | 3.70 | 3.04 |
Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
Release date | 19 October 2010 (14 years ago) | 3 October 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 P960 and PRO A8-9600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2048 KB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | no data | 250 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 3,100 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 P960 and PRO A8-9600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | S1 (S1g4) | AM4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and PRO A8-9600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0 | no data |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
FRTC | - | + |
FreeSync | - | + |
PowerTune | - | + |
TrueAudio | - | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
PowerGating | - | + |
Out-of-band client management | - | + |
VirusProtect | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and PRO A8-9600 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and PRO A8-9600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2400 |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
iGPU core count | no data | 6 |
Enduro | - | + |
UVD | - | + |
VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X4 P960 and PRO A8-9600 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and PRO A8-9600 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and PRO A8-9600.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.01 | 2.16 |
Recency | 19 October 2010 | 3 October 2016 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
Phenom II X4 P960 has 160% lower power consumption.
PRO A8-9600, on the other hand, has a 113.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.
The PRO A8-9600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 P960 in performance tests.
Be aware that Phenom II X4 P960 is a notebook processor while PRO A8-9600 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 P960 and PRO A8-9600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.