Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 vs Phenom II X4 P960

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 P960
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.88
+487%
Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
2003
1 core / 2 threads, 60 Watt
0.15

Phenom II X4 P960 outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 by a whopping 487% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27783567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series4x AMD Phenom IIno data
Power efficiencyno data0.27
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)June 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 P960 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache512 KB8 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data131 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistorsno data55 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 P960 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1 (S1g4)478
Power consumption (TDP)2 MB60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0no data
VirusProtect+-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.40. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.88 0.15
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 60 Watt

Phenom II X4 P960 has a 486.7% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 2900% lower power consumption.

The AMD Phenom II X4 P960 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 P960
Phenom II X4 P960
Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 174 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 P960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Phenom II X4 P960 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.