Atom E680 vs Phenom II X4 P960

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 P960
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.88
+340%

Phenom II X4 P960 outperforms Atom E680 by a whopping 340% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28093515
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series4x AMD Phenom IIno data
Power efficiency1.492.11
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Tunnel Creek (2010)
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)14 September 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 P960 and Atom E680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache512 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data26 mm2
Number of transistorsno data47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 P960 and Atom E680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1 (S1g4)Intel BGA 676
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and Atom E680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0no data
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and Atom E680 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and Atom E680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 600

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.88 0.20
Recency 19 October 2010 14 September 2010
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 4 Watt

Phenom II X4 P960 has a 340% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Atom E680, on the other hand, has 525% lower power consumption.

The AMD Phenom II X4 P960 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom E680 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 P960
Phenom II X4 P960
Intel Atom E680
Atom E680

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 174 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 P960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom E680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Phenom II X4 P960 and Atom E680, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.