Apple M4 (8 cores) vs Phenom II X4 P920
Aggregate performance score
M4 (8 cores) outperforms Phenom II X4 P920 by a whopping 1457% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2823 | 711 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 4x AMD Phenom II | Apple M4 |
| Power efficiency | 1.28 | 100.00 |
| Designer | AMD | Apple |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | no data |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (15 years ago) | 28 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 P920 and M4 (8 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 3 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 P920 and M4 (8 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 (S1g4) | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 P920 and M4 (8 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0 | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 P920 and M4 (8 cores) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 P920 and M4 (8 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M4 8-core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.76 | 11.83 |
| Recency | 12 May 2010 | 28 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 5 Watt |
Apple M4 (8 cores) has a 1456.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 1400% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 (8 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Phenom II X4 P920 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
