Pentium 4 560 vs Phenom II X4 N970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 N970
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.93
+389%

Phenom II X4 N970 outperforms Pentium 4 560 by a whopping 389% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27343505
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series4x AMD Phenom IIPentium 4
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release date16 December 2010 (14 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 N970 and Pentium 4 560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache512 KB16 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data109 mm2
Number of transistorsno data125 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 N970 and Pentium 4 560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1775
Power consumption (TDP)2 MB1 MB

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and Pentium 4 560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Phenom II X4 N970 0.93
+389%
Pentium 4 560 0.19

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Phenom II X4 N970 17.8
+378%
Pentium 4 560 85

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 0.19
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 1 Watt

Phenom II X4 N970 has a 389.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium 4 560, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The AMD Phenom II X4 N970 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium 4 560 in performance tests.

Be aware that Phenom II X4 N970 is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 560 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 N970
Phenom II X4 N970
Intel Pentium 4 560
Pentium 4 560

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 90 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 N970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 21 votes

Rate Pentium 4 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Phenom II X4 N970 and Pentium 4 560, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.