Celeron 4305UE vs Phenom II X4 N950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 N950
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.41
+46.9%

Phenom II X4 N950 outperforms Celeron 4305UE by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23282640
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.38
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series4x AMD Phenom IIno data
Power efficiency1.712.71
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release date4 October 2010 (14 years ago)1 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 N950 and Celeron 4305UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache512 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 N950 and Celeron 4305UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1Intel BGA 1528
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 N950 and Celeron 4305UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 N950 and Celeron 4305UE are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 N950 and Celeron 4305UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 610

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 N950 and Celeron 4305UE.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Phenom II X4 N950 1.41
+46.9%
Celeron 4305UE 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Phenom II X4 N950 2485
+46.3%
Celeron 4305UE 1699

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom II X4 N950 275
Celeron 4305UE 668
+143%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom II X4 N950 986
Celeron 4305UE 1086
+10.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 0.96
Recency 4 October 2010 1 October 2018
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Phenom II X4 N950 has a 46.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron 4305UE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Phenom II X4 N950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 4305UE in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 N950
Phenom II X4 N950
Intel Celeron 4305UE
Celeron 4305UE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 29 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 N950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Phenom II X4 N950 and Celeron 4305UE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.