Core m3-8100Y vs Phenom II X4 N930
Aggregate performance score
m3-8100Y outperforms Phenom II X4 N930 by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 N930 and Core m3-8100Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2364 | 1905 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | 4x AMD Phenom II | Core m3 |
Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) |
Release date | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 30 August 2018 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $281 |
Current price | $99 | $442 (1.6x MSRP) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 N930 and Core m3-8100Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Bus support | 3600 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 512 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 N930 and Core m3-8100Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | S1 | FCBGA1515 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 N930 and Core m3-8100Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3dNow!, SSE (2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Vurtualization, HyperTransport 3.0, DDR3-1333 memory controller | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | no data | + |
AVX | no data | + |
VirusProtect | + | no data |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
My WiFi | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
SIPP | no data | - |
Smart Response | no data | + |
Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Phenom II X4 N930 and Core m3-8100Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
MPX | no data | + |
Identity Protection | no data | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 N930 and Core m3-8100Y are enumerated here.
AMD-V | no data | + |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 N930 and Core m3-8100Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 33.3 GB/s |
ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
Max video memory | no data | 16 GB |
Quick Sync Video | no data | + |
Clear Video | no data | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 900 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X4 N930 and Core m3-8100Y integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | no data | + |
HDMI | no data | + |
DVI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Phenom II X4 N930 and Core m3-8100Y integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | no data | + |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 3840x2160@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 3840x2160@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Phenom II X4 N930 and Core m3-8100Y integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 N930 and Core m3-8100Y.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 10 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core m3-8100Y outperforms Phenom II X4 N930 by 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core m3-8100Y outperforms Phenom II X4 N930 by 84% in Passmark.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Core m3-8100Y outperforms Phenom II X4 N930 by 122% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Phenom II X4 N930 outperforms Core m3-8100Y by 4% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Phenom II X4 N930 outperforms Core m3-8100Y by 3% in wPrime 32.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.01 | 1.85 |
Recency | 12 May 2010 | 30 August 2018 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 5 Watt |
The Core m3-8100Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 N930 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 N930 and Core m3-8100Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.