i3-540 vs Phenom II X4 900e

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 900e
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
0.95
Core i3-540
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
0.97
+2.1%

Core i3-540 outperforms Phenom II X4 900e by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 900e and Core i3-540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25022482
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.11
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.381.26
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date2 June 2009 (15 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$45

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 900e and Core i3-540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.06 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus rateno data2.5 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size258 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data73 °C
Number of transistors758 million382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 900e and Core i3-540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 900e and Core i3-540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Phenom II X4 900e and Core i3-540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 900e and Core i3-540 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 900e and Core i3-540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16.38 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video HDno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X4 900e and Core i3-540 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 900e and Core i3-540.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 900e 0.95
i3-540 0.97
+2.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 900e 1505
i3-540 1539
+2.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 0.97
Recency 2 June 2009 7 January 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 73 Watt

Phenom II X4 900e has 100% more physical cores, and 12.3% lower power consumption.

i3-540, on the other hand, has a 2.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Phenom II X4 900e and Core i3-540.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 900e and Core i3-540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 900e
Phenom II X4 900e
Intel Core i3-540
Core i3-540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 24 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 900e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 665 votes

Rate Core i3-540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 900e or Core i3-540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.