Processor N95 vs Phenom II X3 P840

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X3 P840
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 25 Watt
0.85
Processor N95
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.10
+265%

Processor N95 outperforms Phenom II X3 P840 by a whopping 265% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X3 P840 and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25491608
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series3x AMD Phenom IIIntel Alder Lake-N
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date4 October 2010 (13 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X3 P840 and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads34
Base clock speedno data0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache384 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X3 P840 and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1BGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X3 P840 and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a)no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Phenom II X3 P840 and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 P840 and Processor N95 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 P840 and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X3 P840 and Processor N95.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X3 P840 0.85
Processor N95 3.10
+265%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Phenom II X3 P840 4425
Processor N95 13854
+213%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Phenom II X3 P840 27.7
Processor N95 17.04
+62.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 3.10
Recency 4 October 2010 3 January 2023
Physical cores 3 4
Threads 3 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

Processor N95 has a 264.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Processor N95 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X3 P840 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X3 P840 and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X3 P840
Phenom II X3 P840
Intel Processor N95
Processor N95

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate Phenom II X3 P840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 618 votes

Rate Processor N95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X3 P840 or Processor N95, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.