Mobile Sempron M100 vs Phenom II X3 N830
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X3 N830 outperforms Mobile Sempron M100 by a whopping 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2990 | 3469 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 3x AMD Phenom II | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 0.76 | 0.34 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (15 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X3 N830 and Mobile Sempron M100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 40 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X3 N830 and Mobile Sempron M100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | S |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X3 N830 and Mobile Sempron M100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V | AMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 N830 and Mobile Sempron M100 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 N830 and Mobile Sempron M100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.63 | 0.20 |
| Recency | 12 May 2010 | 10 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 3 | 1 |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Phenom II X3 N830 has a 215% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Mobile Sempron M100, on the other hand, has a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.
The AMD Phenom II X3 N830 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Mobile Sempron M100 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
