Celeron M 763 vs Phenom II X3 N830
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2991 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 3x AMD Phenom II | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 0.76 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (15 years ago) | 1 January 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X3 N830 and Celeron M 763 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X3 N830 and Celeron M 763 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | BGA965 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X3 N830 and Celeron M 763. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 N830 and Celeron M 763 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 N830 and Celeron M 763. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 May 2010 | 1 January 2011 |
| Physical cores | 3 | 1 |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Phenom II X3 N830 has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Celeron M 763, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 250% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Phenom II X3 N830 and Intel Celeron M 763. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
