Phenom II X3 N830 vs Core 2 Extreme X9000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core 2 Extreme X9000
2008
2 cores / 2 threads
0.71
Phenom II X3 N830
2010
3 cores / 3 threads
0.72
+1.4%

Phenom II X3 N830 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Phenom II X3 N830 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25702565
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Extreme3x AMD Phenom II
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)12 May 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$851no data
Current price$450 (0.5x MSRP)$304

Detailed Specifications

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Phenom II X3 N830 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads23
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus support800 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache6 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1V-1.275Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Phenom II X3 N830 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478S1
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Phenom II X3 N830. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V, DDR3-1333 memory controller
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Phenom II X3 N830 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Phenom II X3 N830 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Phenom II X3 N830. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme X9000 0.71
Phenom II X3 N830 0.72
+1.4%

Phenom II X3 N830 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Extreme X9000 1099
Phenom II X3 N830 1107
+0.7%

Phenom II X3 N830 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 1% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Extreme X9000 421
+56.5%
Phenom II X3 N830 269

Core 2 Extreme X9000 outperforms Phenom II X3 N830 by 57% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Extreme X9000 719
Phenom II X3 N830 744
+3.5%

Phenom II X3 N830 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 3% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Extreme X9000 3072
+69.1%
Phenom II X3 N830 1817

Core 2 Extreme X9000 outperforms Phenom II X3 N830 by 69% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Extreme X9000 5843
+17.9%
Phenom II X3 N830 4954

Core 2 Extreme X9000 outperforms Phenom II X3 N830 by 18% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Extreme X9000 2549
+5.7%
Phenom II X3 N830 2412

Core 2 Extreme X9000 outperforms Phenom II X3 N830 by 6% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Core 2 Extreme X9000 29
Phenom II X3 N830 24.7
+17.4%

Core 2 Extreme X9000 outperforms Phenom II X3 N830 by 17% in wPrime 32.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 0.71 0.72
Recency 10 January 2008 12 May 2010
Physical cores 2 3
Threads 2 3
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Phenom II X3 N830.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Phenom II X3 N830, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000
Core 2 Extreme X9000
AMD Phenom II X3 N830
Phenom II X3 N830

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 39 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 34 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 N830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X9000 or Phenom II X3 N830, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.