Celeron 6205 vs Phenom II X2 B57
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2801 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Tiger Lake |
| Power efficiency | 0.38 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Callisto (2009−2010) | Tiger Lake U (2020) |
| Release date | 11 May 2010 (15 years ago) | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X2 B57 and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2/2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 258 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 758 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X2 B57 and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3 | BGA1499 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 15 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X2 B57 and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X2 B57 and Celeron 6205.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 May 2010 | 1 September 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 15 Watt |
Celeron 6205 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 433.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Phenom II X2 B57 and Intel Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X2 B57 is a desktop processor while Celeron 6205 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
