Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Pentium SU4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium SU4100
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.32
+52.4%
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.21

Pentium SU4100 outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium SU4100 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31003228
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataMobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency3.030.32
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Newark (2003)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)August 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium SU4100 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB128K
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nmno data
Die size107 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium SU4100 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketBGA956754
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium SU4100 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Pentium SU4100 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium SU4100 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium SU4100 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium SU4100 0.32
+52.4%
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium SU4100 501
+53.7%
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ 326

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 0.21
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 62 Watt

Pentium SU4100 has a 52.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 520% lower power consumption.

The Pentium SU4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium SU4100 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium SU4100
Pentium SU4100
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 13 votes

Rate Pentium SU4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium SU4100 or Mobile Athlon 64 3200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.