Celeron N2815 vs Pentium P6200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium P6200
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.57
+83.9%
Celeron N2815
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.31

Pentium P6200 outperforms Celeron N2815 by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium P6200 and Celeron N2815 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28273106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.543.91
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date26 September 2010 (14 years ago)1 December 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60$107

Detailed specifications

Pentium P6200 and Celeron N2815 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.13 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed0.13 GHz2.13 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)1 MB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors384 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium P6200 and Celeron N2815 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPGA988FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium P6200 and Celeron N2815. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Smart Connectno data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Pentium P6200 and Celeron N2815 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium P6200 and Celeron N2815 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium P6200 and Celeron N2815. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-1066
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHz756 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium P6200 and Celeron N2815 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium P6200 and Celeron N2815.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes164
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium P6200 0.57
+83.9%
Celeron N2815 0.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium P6200 908
+84.6%
Celeron N2815 492

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium P6200 285
+88.7%
Celeron N2815 151

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium P6200 479
+90.8%
Celeron N2815 251

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium P6200 2394
+124%
Celeron N2815 1068

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium P6200 4620
+127%
Celeron N2815 2038

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium P6200 32.47
+78%
Celeron N2815 57.8

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Pentium P6200 1
+103%
Celeron N2815 1

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Pentium P6200 0.71
+97.2%
Celeron N2815 0.36

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 0.31
Recency 26 September 2010 1 December 2013
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 7 Watt

Pentium P6200 has a 83.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N2815, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Pentium P6200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2815 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium P6200 and Celeron N2815, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium P6200
Pentium P6200
Intel Celeron N2815
Celeron N2815

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 306 votes

Rate Pentium P6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 40 votes

Rate Celeron N2815 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium P6200 or Celeron N2815, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.