Celeron 3867U vs Pentium N4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium N4200
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.40
+47.4%

Pentium N4200 outperforms Celeron 3867U by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium N4200 and Celeron 3867U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21252408
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date1 September 2016 (7 years ago)1 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$107
Current price$352 (2.2x MSRP)$341 (3.2x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Pentium N4200 and Celeron 3867U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium N4200 and Celeron 3867U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1296FCBGA1356,FC-BGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron 3867U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP--
Smart Response-+
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Pentium N4200 and Celeron 3867U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron 3867U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron 3867U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR3, DDR4DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.1 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 505Intel HD Graphics 610
Max video memory8 GB32 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency750 MHz900 MHz
Execution Units1812

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N4200 and Celeron 3867U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron 3867U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron 3867U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+12
OpenGL+4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron 3867U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes612
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium N4200 1.40
+47.4%
Celeron 3867U 0.95

Pentium N4200 outperforms Celeron 3867U by 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium N4200 2170
+47.9%
Celeron 3867U 1467

Pentium N4200 outperforms Celeron 3867U by 48% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium N4200 272
Celeron 3867U 358
+31.6%

Celeron 3867U outperforms Pentium N4200 by 32% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium N4200 705
+12.8%
Celeron 3867U 625

Pentium N4200 outperforms Celeron 3867U by 13% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium N4200 163
+21.6%
Celeron 3867U 134

Pentium N4200 outperforms Celeron 3867U by 22% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.40 0.95
Integrated graphics card 0.87 1.84
Recency 1 September 2016 1 March 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Cost $161 $107
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

The Pentium N4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3867U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N4200 and Celeron 3867U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium N4200
Pentium N4200
Intel Celeron 3867U
Celeron 3867U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 662 votes

Rate Pentium N4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 20 votes

Rate Celeron 3867U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium N4200 or Celeron 3867U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.