Phenom II X3 N870 vs Pentium N3710
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X3 N870 outperforms Pentium N3710 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium N3710 and Phenom II X3 N870 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2563 | 2434 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Pentium | 3x AMD Phenom II |
Power efficiency | 13.89 | 2.87 |
Architecture codename | Braswell (2015−2016) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
Release date | 1 April 2016 (8 years ago) | 16 December 2010 (14 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $161 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium N3710 and Phenom II X3 N870 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 3 (Tri-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 3 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.56 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Bus type | IDI | no data |
Bus rate | no data | 3600 MHz |
L1 cache | no data | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1.5 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium N3710 and Phenom II X3 N870 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | FCBGA1170 | S1 (S1g4) |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3710 and Phenom II X3 N870. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V |
AES-NI | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Smart Connect | - | no data |
HD Audio | + | no data |
RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium N3710 and Phenom II X3 N870 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Boot | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
OS Guard | - | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3710 and Phenom II X3 N870 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
VT-i | - | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3710 and Phenom II X3 N870. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) (400 - 700 MHz) | no data |
Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 700 MHz | no data |
Execution Units | 16 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N3710 and Phenom II X3 N870 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Pentium N3710 and Phenom II X3 N870 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | + | no data |
OpenGL | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3710 and Phenom II X3 N870.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.88 | 1.06 |
Recency | 1 April 2016 | 16 December 2010 |
Physical cores | 4 | 3 |
Threads | 4 | 3 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 35 Watt |
Pentium N3710 has an age advantage of 5 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.
Phenom II X3 N870, on the other hand, has a 20.5% higher aggregate performance score.
The Phenom II X3 N870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium N3710 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N3710 and Phenom II X3 N870, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.