Celeron N3450 vs Pentium N3700

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Pentium N3700
2015
4 cores / 4 threads
0.80
Celeron N3450
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
1.28
+60%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 60% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Pentium N3700 and Celeron N3450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24702155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Apollo Lake (2016)
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)1 September 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$107
Current price$358 (2.2x MSRP)$242 (2.3x MSRP)

Technical specs

Pentium N3700 and Celeron N3450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium N3700 and Celeron N3450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3700 and Celeron N3450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP--
Smart Response--
GPIO++
Smart Connect--
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
HD Audio++
RST--

Security technologies

Pentium N3700 and Celeron N3450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Boot++
Secure Key++
MPXno data+
Identity Protection++
OS Guard-+
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3700 and Celeron N3450 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i--
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3700 and Celeron N3450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000 SeriesIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memory8 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency700 MHz700 MHz
Execution Units1612
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N3700 and Celeron N3450 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium N3700 and Celeron N3450 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX++
OpenGL++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3700 and Celeron N3450.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes46
USB revision2.0/3.02.0/3.0
Total number of SATA ports22
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports22
Number of USB ports58
Integrated LAN--
UART++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium N3700 0.80
Celeron N3450 1.28
+60%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 60% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium N3700 1242
Celeron N3450 1979
+59.3%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 59% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium N3700 179
Celeron N3450 240
+34.1%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 34% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium N3700 518
Celeron N3450 677
+30.7%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 31% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Pentium N3700 1200
Celeron N3450 1415
+17.9%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 18% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium N3700 3148
Celeron N3450 3959
+25.8%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 26% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium N3700 2175
Celeron N3450 2576
+18.5%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 18% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Pentium N3700 23.09
Celeron N3450 22.31
+3.5%

Pentium N3700 outperforms Celeron N3450 by 3% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pentium N3700 2
Celeron N3450 2
+9.4%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 9% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium N3700 141
Celeron N3450 143
+1.4%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 1% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium N3700 37
Celeron N3450 45
+20.3%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 20% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pentium N3700 0.45
Celeron N3450 0.53
+17.8%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 18% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N3700 0.9
Celeron N3450 1.2
+27.7%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 28% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N3700 1030
+1%
Celeron N3450 1020

Pentium N3700 outperforms Celeron N3450 by 1% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N3700 50
Celeron N3450 58
+17%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 17% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N3700 10
Celeron N3450 12
+19.5%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 20% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pentium N3700 956
Celeron N3450 1202
+25.7%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 26% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pentium N3700 3211
Celeron N3450 3958
+23.3%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 23% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.80 1.28
Recency 1 April 2015 1 September 2016
Cost $161 $107

The Celeron N3450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium N3700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N3700 and Celeron N3450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium N3700
Pentium N3700
Intel Celeron N3450
Celeron N3450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 309 votes

Rate Pentium N3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 144 votes

Rate Celeron N3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium N3700 or Celeron N3450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.