Processor U300 vs Pentium N3540

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium N3540
2014, $251
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.69
Processor U300
2023, $193
5 cores / 6 threads, 15 Watt
5.00
+625%

Processor U300 outperforms Pentium N3540 by a whopping 625% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29881431
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0317.44
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Raptor Lake-U
Power efficiency3.8814.06
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Raptor Lake-U (2023)
Release date22 May 2014 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$251$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Processor U300 has 58033% better value for money than Pentium N3540.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Pentium N3540 and Processor U300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)5 (Penta-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speed2.16 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rateno data55 MHz
L1 cache224 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium N3540 and Processor U300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3540 and Processor U300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data

Security technologies

Pentium N3540 and Processor U300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3540 and Processor U300 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3540 and Processor U300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.32 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency896 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N3540 and Processor U300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium N3540 and Processor U300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3540 and Processor U300.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes48
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium N3540 0.69
Processor U300 5.00
+625%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium N3540 1364
Processor U300 8897
+553%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium N3540 4752
Processor U300 25107
+428%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Pentium N3540 157
Processor U300 781
+399%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Pentium N3540 42
Processor U300 222
+429%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Pentium N3540 0.3
Processor U300 4.7
+1521%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Pentium N3540 54
Processor U300 216
+298%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Pentium N3540 11
Processor U300 52
+369%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 5.00
Integrated graphics card 0.72 4.32
Recency 22 May 2014 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 5
Threads 4 6
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

Pentium N3540 has 114% lower power consumption.

Processor U300, on the other hand, has a 625% higher aggregate performance score, 500% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 25% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Processor U300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium N3540 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 569 votes

Rate Pentium N3540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 22 votes

Rate Processor U300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium N3540 and Processor U300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.