EPYC 7543P vs Pentium N3540
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7543P outperforms Pentium N3540 by a whopping 5400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2882 | 83 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.03 | 14.19 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Pentium | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 3.89 | 7.13 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | 22 May 2014 (11 years ago) | 15 March 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $251 | $2,730 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 7543P has 47200% better value for money than Pentium N3540.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Pentium N3540 and EPYC 7543P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 28 |
| L1 cache | 224 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Die size | no data | 8x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium N3540 and EPYC 7543P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 225 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3540 and EPYC 7543P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Smart Connect | + | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium N3540 and EPYC 7543P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3540 and EPYC 7543P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3540 and EPYC 7543P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1333 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.32 GB/s | 204.795 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series | N/A |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 896 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N3540 and EPYC 7543P integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Pentium N3540 and EPYC 7543P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 11.2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3540 and EPYC 7543P.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 128 |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.69 | 37.95 |
| Recency | 22 May 2014 | 15 March 2021 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 32 |
| Threads | 4 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 225 Watt |
Pentium N3540 has 3114.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7543P, on the other hand, has a 5400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 7543P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium N3540 in performance tests.
Be aware that Pentium N3540 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7543P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
