Celeron N3450 vs Pentium N3540

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Pentium N3540
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
0.78
Celeron N3450
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
1.28
+64.1%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 64% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Pentium N3540 and Celeron N3450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25032162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Apollo Lake (2016)
Release date22 May 2014 (9 years ago)1 September 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$251$107
Current price$404 (1.6x MSRP)$242 (2.3x MSRP)

Detailed Specifications

Pentium N3540 and Celeron N3450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.16 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache224 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium N3540 and Celeron N3450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3540 and Celeron N3450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connect+-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Pentium N3540 and Celeron N3450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
MPXno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3540 and Celeron N3450 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3540 and Celeron N3450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR3, DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency896 MHz700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N3540 and Celeron N3450 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium N3540 and Celeron N3450 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3540 and Celeron N3450.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes46
USB revision3.0 and 2.02.0/3.0
Total number of SATA ports22
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB ports58
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium N3540 0.78
Celeron N3450 1.28
+64.1%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 64% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium N3540 1209
Celeron N3450 1979
+63.7%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 64% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium N3540 192
Celeron N3450 240
+25%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 25% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium N3540 557
Celeron N3450 676
+21.4%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 21% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Pentium N3540 1364
Celeron N3450 1415
+3.8%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 4% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium N3540 4752
+20%
Celeron N3450 3959

Pentium N3540 outperforms Celeron N3450 by 20% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Pentium N3540 21.92
+1.8%
Celeron N3450 22.31

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 2% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pentium N3540 2
+1.6%
Celeron N3450 2

Pentium N3540 outperforms Celeron N3450 by 2% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium N3540 157
+9.4%
Celeron N3450 143

Pentium N3540 outperforms Celeron N3450 by 9% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium N3540 42
Celeron N3450 45
+6%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 6% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pentium N3540 0.5
Celeron N3450 0.53
+6%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 6% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N3540 0.3
Celeron N3450 1.2
+314%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 314% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N3540 1210
+18.6%
Celeron N3450 1020

Pentium N3540 outperforms Celeron N3450 by 19% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N3540 54
Celeron N3450 58
+7.2%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 7% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N3540 11
Celeron N3450 12
+7.9%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 8% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pentium N3540 988
Celeron N3450 1202
+21.7%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 22% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pentium N3540 3254
Celeron N3450 3958
+21.6%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 22% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 0.78 1.28
Recency 22 May 2014 1 September 2016
Cost $251 $107
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 6 Watt

The Celeron N3450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium N3540 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N3540 and Celeron N3450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium N3540
Pentium N3540
Intel Celeron N3450
Celeron N3450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 460 votes

Rate Pentium N3540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 146 votes

Rate Celeron N3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium N3540 or Celeron N3450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.